Most Liked Casino Bonuses in the last 7 days π°
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
Countering the previous approval by several city officials, East Boston voters rejected the proposal for a $1 billion resort-casino development at.
Enjoy!
East Boston voters deny Suffolk Downs casino construction β The Daily Free Press
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
Voters in East Boston rejected a proposal for a casino at Suffolk Downs.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
BOSTON (AP) β Casino supporters in the state were dealt twin setbacks on Tuesday as voters in East Boston rejected a proposal by the.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
East Boston residents voted a resounding no to Suffolk Downs' casino bid in an election-night shocker that rocked the gaming landscape and.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
BOSTON (AP) β Casino supporters in the state were dealt twin setbacks on Tuesday as voters in East Boston rejected a proposal by the.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
The owners of the Suffolk Downs racetrack have officially placed their bets on a Revere-only casino plan after voters in East Boston rejected a.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
Voters in East Boston and Palmer rejected casino proposals pushed by developers who hoped to build resorts at Suffolk Downs and a wooded.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
Countering the previous approval by several city officials, East Boston voters rejected the proposal for a $1 billion resort-casino development at.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
East Boston residents voted a resounding no to Suffolk Downs' casino bid in an election-night shocker that rocked the gaming landscape and.
Enjoy!
- B6655644
- Bonus:
- Free Spins
- Players:
- All
- WR:
- 30 xB
- Max cash out:
- $ 1000
Voters in East Boston and Palmer rejected casino proposals pushed by developers who hoped to build resorts at Suffolk Downs and a wooded.
Enjoy!
As confusing as this might be for voters, Suffolk needs their approval before it can compete against two potent rivals that are also seeking the license for a casino to be built in the untapped, lucrative Eastern Massachusetts market. Whether Caesars is part of the project does not matter to many. He said the track would acquire a new partner quickly and hold it to the same standards agreed to by Caesars. He said Suffolk could overcome that disadvantage with the promise of 4, permanent jobs; last month, 1, people turned out for a job fair at the track to learn about opportunities. The commission did deem Suffolk Downs suitable for a casino. Sanchez, who is from Colombia, said she was also worried that the casino would drive up rents and force her out. But in mid-October, the Massachusetts Gaming Commission , reputed to be one of the toughest in the country, pulled the plug on Caesars, saying it was unsuitable for doing business in the state. If the referendum passes, she said, opponents will probably challenge it in court. But opponents say that it changes everything and that it is absurd for voters to be passing judgment on something that does not exist. She said many other immigrants who had worked hard to establish themselves here feared the same. At stake is billions of dollars in anticipated revenue, some of which will be shared with the host community and the state. Among the skeptics in East Boston, where half the population is Latino, many work in the small businesses that make up the lifeblood of the neighborhood. Now, Suffolk Downs is suddenly scrambling to find a new partner. Voters in East Boston and Revere have to approve the plan for it to go forward. Amelia Sanchez, 60, who owns La Sultana bakery, said she opposed the casino because she was afraid it would bring drugs, prostitution and gang violence. He also said the loss of Caesars had not hurt his campaign. Worse, they say, voters have no idea what they are voting on. Suffolk Downs asked Caesars to withdraw, and it did. Menino of Boston. The gambling commission is to award the license by spring. Home Page World U.{/INSERTKEYS}{/PARAGRAPH} Voters in Revere appear poised to approve it. Caesars said it was equally surprised. Residents there have approved his project with Milford will vote on the Foxwoods plan on Nov. With her daughter, Jennifer, 20, translating, Mrs. {PARAGRAPH}{INSERTKEYS}BOSTON β Suffolk Downs, a famed but fading thoroughbred racetrack in the neighborhood of East Boston, had dreams of a major revitalization, and when the state approved casinos in , it partnered with the Caesars Entertainment Corporation to apply for the sole casino license that would be awarded in the greater Boston area. Suffolk Downs officials said they were blindsided by the report. As track officials seek a new partner, they have sought to minimize any sense of disruption. But opponents say there is no guarantee that a new partner will abide by the agreements reached with Caesars on matters such as number of jobs, employee benefits and payments to the city. The track, where the Beatles played in , is also a sentimental favorite since it has been here almost 80 years. Generally, he said, 25 percent to 30 percent of people oppose casinos for moral or religious reasons. Suffolk Downs was believed to have the edge because of its strong political backing, most notably from Mayor Thomas M. Chip Tuttle, the chief operating officer of Suffolk Downs, said the ballot referendum was merely a land use question for voters. Once they have local approval, the casinos must submit their final applications to the state by Dec.